Pitchers and Catchers report to Ft. Meyers Florida for the first day of Spring Training on Thursday, and there will be plenty for Red Sox Nation to keep their collective eyes on from Now until Easter Sunday when the Beantown Boys open against the 2010 Season against the New York Yankees.
The Sox made a substantial splash in Free Agency this off-season signing former Anaheim Angels Ace, John Lackey, to a five year $82.5 million contract...to be the third starter and shore up an above average staff. The signing of Lackey brings several questions to the forefront in terms of the rotation. Who is the odd man out? Conventional wisdom says it is the Sox elder statesman, Tim Wakefield, who may be a spot starter, or assigned to the bullpen for mop up duty. The Sox now have one of the more formidable rotations in Baseball with Jon Lester, Josh Beckett, and Lackey. As it appears now, Clay Buchholz is most likely to be the fourth starter with Dauiske Matsusaka coming off an injury plagued 2009 as the fifth starter. Dice-K has already shown up to camp in great shape, and appears ready to be a good soldier and fall into line, after pushing the limit last season with his injuries blaming the Sox brass for not letting him do his own health regiment.
The Lackey signing also has brought the Josh Beckett contract status to the forefront. If Beckett is to sign an extension to stay in Boston, is it going to be for Lackey money or not so much. It remains to be seen what shape Beckett is going to show up to Ft. Meyers in, is he going to resemble the Josh Beckett that went 20-7 with a 3.27 ERA in 2007 or the inconsistent Josh Beckett who went 17-6 with a 3.86 ERA in 2009 who was a pre-season Cy Young favorite. Beckett should be a favorite again for the Cy Young this season if he can stay healthy. Expect to see Beckett be the clear cut ace of this staff by May.
The last question in my mind goes back to Buchholz, will he be the fourth starter, or featured in a trade for a bat to replace the departure of of slugger Jason Bay who signed with the Mets on December 29th. The Sox did sign some notable position players this off-season including Mike Cameron to roam the lawn, and Marco Scutaro to bring some semblance of stability to shortstop, and both of those players are past their offensive prime, but add a some defense to aid the staff. But the Sox proved last year with the Brad Penney/John Smoltz experiment, you can't have too much depth on the hill. So I am not certain the Sox have enough to replace Buchholz in a trade, and god forbid an injury to one of the top starters at the same time. It will be
Monday, February 15, 2010
Saturday, July 4, 2009
Media being Manny
Last night marked the return of L.A. Dodger Slugger Manny Ramirez who was suspended 50 games for violating Major League Baseball's Performance Enhancing Drug policy. Manny missed 50 games and lost $7 million, he owned up to it, in his own way, and that should be it and we can move on, right? Not even close bud.
We are, hopefully, coming out of the dark ages of baseball known as the "Steroid Era," but it seems Manny is getting a free pass. Why are the major sports outlets treating this as if Manny is coming back from a horrific injury and he defied all the odds? Why are the fans flocking to this guy as if he is a victim of some major conspiracy? Now the nonsense will start that if this happened in Boston it would be treated the same way it is in LA, but the reality of the matter is simple, it didn't happen in Boston it happened in LA. ESPN News cut in for Manny's at bats in the minor leagues, some headlines across the nation insinuated that even Manny went 0-3 with a walk in his return, that his presence sparked the best team in baseball who was winning while Manny was on his sabbatical.
This time last year in Boston we were all expecting a Manny trade, heck I was praying for a Manny trade. His antics used to range from missing games down the stretch, to not running out a ball for a hit, to urinating inside the Green Monster at Fenway. But when he began to get physical with teammate Kevin Youklilis in the dugout and push down the Clubhouse Attendant for not getting him the exact number of tickets he wanted (clubhouse attendant Jack McCormick was in his 60's) that is when Manny being Manny became too much for the Boston Faithful. I am appreciative of what Manny did when he was in Boston in terms of his offensive output, but I am glad he is gone and he is Frank McCourt's problem now.
Manny's crimes against the game of baseball don't stop with the steroids and the lack of care about the teams he plays for, but the way he treated LA Dodgers owner Frank McCourt this pre-season shows how much he doesn't understand about the game of baseball, or how highly he thinks of himself at 35 years old. Manny wanted a Mark Texieria or Alex Rodriguez contract, and at this point in the game, not even his lackey, McCourt, would give him that.
Manny lives in a world all of his own. He embraced the "Manny Being Manny" mindset in Boston, and when he got to LA last summer he uttered the words "Welcome to Mannywood," the sad reality is Mannywood isn't LA now that he is there, but Mannywood is the delusional world Manny lives in on a day to day basis.
The fact that Manny is being hailed as a hero and someone who was wronged, for cheating, illustrates just what is wrong with Major League Baseball today. It is like the Godfather Part III when Michael Corleone acknowledges "just when I think I'm out, they pull me back in." Just when we think we are starting to get past the steroid nonsense we have a Roger Clemens, or Alex Rodriguez, or Manny happen. Hopefully we can start focusing on some of what makes this game great, baseball not steroids and certainly not Manny Ramirez.
We are, hopefully, coming out of the dark ages of baseball known as the "Steroid Era," but it seems Manny is getting a free pass. Why are the major sports outlets treating this as if Manny is coming back from a horrific injury and he defied all the odds? Why are the fans flocking to this guy as if he is a victim of some major conspiracy? Now the nonsense will start that if this happened in Boston it would be treated the same way it is in LA, but the reality of the matter is simple, it didn't happen in Boston it happened in LA. ESPN News cut in for Manny's at bats in the minor leagues, some headlines across the nation insinuated that even Manny went 0-3 with a walk in his return, that his presence sparked the best team in baseball who was winning while Manny was on his sabbatical.
This time last year in Boston we were all expecting a Manny trade, heck I was praying for a Manny trade. His antics used to range from missing games down the stretch, to not running out a ball for a hit, to urinating inside the Green Monster at Fenway. But when he began to get physical with teammate Kevin Youklilis in the dugout and push down the Clubhouse Attendant for not getting him the exact number of tickets he wanted (clubhouse attendant Jack McCormick was in his 60's) that is when Manny being Manny became too much for the Boston Faithful. I am appreciative of what Manny did when he was in Boston in terms of his offensive output, but I am glad he is gone and he is Frank McCourt's problem now.
Manny's crimes against the game of baseball don't stop with the steroids and the lack of care about the teams he plays for, but the way he treated LA Dodgers owner Frank McCourt this pre-season shows how much he doesn't understand about the game of baseball, or how highly he thinks of himself at 35 years old. Manny wanted a Mark Texieria or Alex Rodriguez contract, and at this point in the game, not even his lackey, McCourt, would give him that.
Manny lives in a world all of his own. He embraced the "Manny Being Manny" mindset in Boston, and when he got to LA last summer he uttered the words "Welcome to Mannywood," the sad reality is Mannywood isn't LA now that he is there, but Mannywood is the delusional world Manny lives in on a day to day basis.
The fact that Manny is being hailed as a hero and someone who was wronged, for cheating, illustrates just what is wrong with Major League Baseball today. It is like the Godfather Part III when Michael Corleone acknowledges "just when I think I'm out, they pull me back in." Just when we think we are starting to get past the steroid nonsense we have a Roger Clemens, or Alex Rodriguez, or Manny happen. Hopefully we can start focusing on some of what makes this game great, baseball not steroids and certainly not Manny Ramirez.
Friday, July 3, 2009
Boston's Rushmore Part I
In 1941 Construction finished on Mt. Rushmore an homage to George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln in the hills of South Dakota. What does this have to do with Boston Sports? Everything.
Lately in water cooler talks there have been references to what would Boston's Sports Rushmore look like. After several beer filled conversations with some of my buddies, I came to a conclusion there are too many variables in coming up with only 1 Rushmore. There are too many factors to consider when talking about the most influential, favorite, hated, or immortal athletes in such a rich tapestry as Boston sports. Who says there needs to only be one? Below are my nominations for several Boston Rushmores, originally I had discussions for each of them, but some didn't need it and would read like a novel. I welcome the discussions and challenges.
Faces of the Franchise Rushmore:
Lately in water cooler talks there have been references to what would Boston's Sports Rushmore look like. After several beer filled conversations with some of my buddies, I came to a conclusion there are too many variables in coming up with only 1 Rushmore. There are too many factors to consider when talking about the most influential, favorite, hated, or immortal athletes in such a rich tapestry as Boston sports. Who says there needs to only be one? Below are my nominations for several Boston Rushmores, originally I had discussions for each of them, but some didn't need it and would read like a novel. I welcome the discussions and challenges.
Faces of the Franchise Rushmore:
- Ted Williams (Boston Red Sox)
- Bill Russell (Boston Celtics)
- Bobby Orr (Boston Bruins)
- Tom Brady (New England Patriots)
- Terry Francona (Boston Red Sox)
- Red Auerbach (Boston Celtics)
- Tom Johnson (Boston Bruins)
- Bill Belichick (New England Patriots)
- John Henry/Tom Werner (Boston Red Sox)
- Walter Brown (Boston Celtics)
- Where there are only 4 faces available Werner will take the place of a Bruins Ownership...I mean who wants to see Jeremy Jacobs mug up there? Maybe next year could be different...
- Robert Kraft (New England Patriots)
- Ned Martin (Boston Red Sox)
- Johnny Most (Boston Celtics)
- Fred Cusick (Boston Bruins)
- Gil Santos (New England Patriots)
- Jerry Remy (Boston Red Sox)
- Tommy Heinsohn (Boston Celtics)
- Derek Sanderson (Boston Bruins) *Andy Brickley is the Remy of Hockey, but Sanderson was the man!
- Gino Capelletti (New Englad Patriots)
- Nomar Garicaparra (Boston Red Sox)
- Dee Brown (Boston Celtics)
- Joe Thornton (Boston Bruins)
- Drew Bledsoe (New England Patriots)
- Tony Conigliaro (Boston Red Sox)
- Len Bias (Boston Celtics)
- Norman Leveille (Boston Bruins)
- Darrell Stingley (New England Patriots)
Friday, June 19, 2009
Thanks for the memories, but now it's time to go...
First off, I love Fenway park, to a true Sox fan (not a pink hat) walking into Fenway Park is similar to an art connoisseur walking into the museum of Fine Arts. I get caught up in the nostalgia, until I have to find a parking space, pay $40 for that parking space, pay $7.00 for a half a cup of beer, sit in a seat that is fine for someone who is 3 feet tall, not 6"1 225 pounds. Fenway will be 100 years old in 3 seasons, and that will be something to see and quite the landmark to see Fenway Park reach 100 years old.
With that being said ground should be broken the next spring on a new stadium. I am nostalgic as the next guy and appreciate the rich history of this park, but time is a vicious dictator, and in this day and age 100 years is to long for a professional sports stadium, especially in this market. We have been conditioned by generations of Sox fans before us to look at Fenway Park as a shrine, a lineage of thought passed down the line since 1912, and one that I subscribed to, until I went to Camden Yards in 2003. When I could sit down comfortably without wrapping my legs around the person next to me, which would be fine if it were Alyssa Milano...um...or my wife, yeah my wife, not Alyssa Milano, but it is neither at Fenway, but usually a fat drunk who is more concerned with trying to get on TV than watching the game. During a rain delay when everyone runs for the concourse, it feels less like a ball park and more like one of those "how many people can you fit in a phone booth stunts."
I still remember the first time I walked into that stadium, the stale air wreaking of beer, peanuts, and hotdogs . I remember thinking every person in America must have been in that stadium that day, I had never seen so many people in one place. But the magic happened when I walked out and saw the crystal blue sky, the Shawmut Bank sign over the Monster, the famous Citgo sign which to this day is a famous Fenway landmark, but more impressively to me was seeing how white the Sox uniforms were and how big the players were. When I saw Wade Boggs, Rich Gedman, Dwight Evans, and Jim Rice live, I thought I had seen it all at eight years old. To listen to my Nana talk about how my Grandfather would go down to the park with a cooler filled with sandwiches to watch the doubleheaders, I couldn't help but think what it must have been like to see the likes of Ted Williams, Johnny Peksy, Jimmy Foxx, Bobby Doerr, et al. My Mom still talks about how my Grandfather continued his love of the team as he took my Mom and her siblings to the Patriot's Day game and then to watch the finish of the marathon, and saw the likes of Carl Yastrzemski , Tony Conigliaro, and Rico Petrocelli. As recently as last week I was at Fenway watching the Sox take batting practice prior to a game with the Yankees, while Alex Rodriguez and Derek Jeter warmed up in the outfield. I looked at the Green Monster in Left field and looked at the dents on that giant homerun killer which make it look like a giant golf ball, I couldn't help but think of the caliber of the legends who are responsible for those dents, and it makes it hard to think about another Fenway.
I think the Boston Red Sox ownership tandem of John Henry, Tom Werner, and Larry Lucchino (the brain trust as I call them) have done an outstanding job of preserving the ball park and bringing it as current as they have by adding thousands of seats over the last several years, but how much space is left, really, what's next seats in the press box...well maybe that might work out alright after all. But you catch my drift.
All joking aside, I think the brain trust need to be commended for breathing new life into a stadium kept alive only by memories of teams who broke our hearts annually, and prior to 2004 when the Red Sox won their first World Series since 1918, was hope for a championship again at Fenway. They have been able to satisfy the masses by not tearing down Fenway but renovating the old ballpark, they may have unknowingly laid the ground work for getting a new stadium and doing it the right way. The fans have embraced the changes, and seemingly look forward to what changes will be made in the off-season. I am hopeful one of the changes in my lifetime will be a new ballpark. But it has to be done the right way, the can't be too overzealous when setting prices, they have to make sure the amenities are right and not overdone, they have to make sure the new stadium doesn't take away or bring into question the integrity of the game.
There have been several teams who have made some big mistakes in the new stadiums, and they both happen to be in New York. The most talked about in 2009 is the new Yankee Stadium which has overpriced seats they can't give away; it is a batting practice field where there have been an obscene amount of homeruns, 119 in the first 34 games of the season...to the point where Johnny Damon is a power threat. To the point where June 18, 2oo9 saw a historic game...the first game at the New Yankee Stadium where there was not a homerun hit. Really, that is what makes historyat a new ball park? A game with no homeruns, that's history, really?
The Red Sox ownership is in a situation where they can take what's right with Fenway and work that into a state of the art Stadium. New doesn't mean bad. Some of the newer stadiums have more space, more amenities, more to do with the family, heck some even have parking AT the stadium, not in private lots 2 miles away from the stadium where the fans spend half the time worrying if your car is even going to be there when you get back, exit routes that allow fans to stay and enjoy the game so they don't have to leave in the fourth inning to beat traffic and ensure they are home before sunrise. Some of the amenities a new ballpark would have would be very similar to what some of the changes to Fenway have been already, new concourses, new meal options, an outside experience on Yawkey Way, but the difference is it wouldn't be forced into an already cramped space.
The critics of the plan to build a new Fenway talk about the mystique of Fenway, the charm of Fenway, and the memories of Fenway. These are the same critics who said the same thing about the old Boston Garden, but I ask those folks, what is the better venue to watch a game? Obviously the Shawmut Center, uh I mean the Fleet Center, I mean the TD BankNorth Garden. It isn't the age of the stadium that gives a stadium charm and personality, it is one thing...winning and superstars. All of a sudden the new Garden has charm and personality and that is because there is a championship banner hanging from the rafters from a championship won in that building...that is charm. The Red Sox have recent Championships, Superstar players, and they win. I can't see that changing with a new home.
What is to say if a new Fenway is built, the Monster can't come along or Pesky's Pole (or Fisk's Pole, that one didn't work out to well for the brain trust), and that will be a satisfactory way of pacifying the nostalgia needs of the "Save Fenway" brigade. Once opening day rolls around in the new stadium, the pain of losing Fenway will subside the way the pain of a child losing their pet goes away as soon as Mommy brings home Fido II. Once the wins, and shutouts, and homeruns, and championships start rolling in the new Fenway will be entrenched in our hearts, but it is getting there that will be the hard part, convincing the city of Boston for the help needed to get this project going and the biggest obstacle may be just be deciding to make the call to do it.
This ownership team has the unfavorable task over the next several years to make a hard decision, keep the house of Yaz, or turn the page and begin a new chapter in the rich history of this franchise. Time marches on and real estate is is often times left in the wake of an uncaring, unattached, unstoppable force; Players retire, Horses are put out to stud, and buildings are demolished. It is the natural progression of things, and Fenway has given generations of Bostonians lifetimes of memories, but her best days are past and it is time to put her out of her misery. So to Fenway, I love you, and thanks for the memories, but now it's time to go off into and claim your place in Baseball folklore.
With that being said ground should be broken the next spring on a new stadium. I am nostalgic as the next guy and appreciate the rich history of this park, but time is a vicious dictator, and in this day and age 100 years is to long for a professional sports stadium, especially in this market. We have been conditioned by generations of Sox fans before us to look at Fenway Park as a shrine, a lineage of thought passed down the line since 1912, and one that I subscribed to, until I went to Camden Yards in 2003. When I could sit down comfortably without wrapping my legs around the person next to me, which would be fine if it were Alyssa Milano...um...or my wife, yeah my wife, not Alyssa Milano, but it is neither at Fenway, but usually a fat drunk who is more concerned with trying to get on TV than watching the game. During a rain delay when everyone runs for the concourse, it feels less like a ball park and more like one of those "how many people can you fit in a phone booth stunts."
I still remember the first time I walked into that stadium, the stale air wreaking of beer, peanuts, and hotdogs . I remember thinking every person in America must have been in that stadium that day, I had never seen so many people in one place. But the magic happened when I walked out and saw the crystal blue sky, the Shawmut Bank sign over the Monster, the famous Citgo sign which to this day is a famous Fenway landmark, but more impressively to me was seeing how white the Sox uniforms were and how big the players were. When I saw Wade Boggs, Rich Gedman, Dwight Evans, and Jim Rice live, I thought I had seen it all at eight years old. To listen to my Nana talk about how my Grandfather would go down to the park with a cooler filled with sandwiches to watch the doubleheaders, I couldn't help but think what it must have been like to see the likes of Ted Williams, Johnny Peksy, Jimmy Foxx, Bobby Doerr, et al. My Mom still talks about how my Grandfather continued his love of the team as he took my Mom and her siblings to the Patriot's Day game and then to watch the finish of the marathon, and saw the likes of Carl Yastrzemski , Tony Conigliaro, and Rico Petrocelli. As recently as last week I was at Fenway watching the Sox take batting practice prior to a game with the Yankees, while Alex Rodriguez and Derek Jeter warmed up in the outfield. I looked at the Green Monster in Left field and looked at the dents on that giant homerun killer which make it look like a giant golf ball, I couldn't help but think of the caliber of the legends who are responsible for those dents, and it makes it hard to think about another Fenway.
I think the Boston Red Sox ownership tandem of John Henry, Tom Werner, and Larry Lucchino (the brain trust as I call them) have done an outstanding job of preserving the ball park and bringing it as current as they have by adding thousands of seats over the last several years, but how much space is left, really, what's next seats in the press box...well maybe that might work out alright after all. But you catch my drift.
All joking aside, I think the brain trust need to be commended for breathing new life into a stadium kept alive only by memories of teams who broke our hearts annually, and prior to 2004 when the Red Sox won their first World Series since 1918, was hope for a championship again at Fenway. They have been able to satisfy the masses by not tearing down Fenway but renovating the old ballpark, they may have unknowingly laid the ground work for getting a new stadium and doing it the right way. The fans have embraced the changes, and seemingly look forward to what changes will be made in the off-season. I am hopeful one of the changes in my lifetime will be a new ballpark. But it has to be done the right way, the can't be too overzealous when setting prices, they have to make sure the amenities are right and not overdone, they have to make sure the new stadium doesn't take away or bring into question the integrity of the game.
There have been several teams who have made some big mistakes in the new stadiums, and they both happen to be in New York. The most talked about in 2009 is the new Yankee Stadium which has overpriced seats they can't give away; it is a batting practice field where there have been an obscene amount of homeruns, 119 in the first 34 games of the season...to the point where Johnny Damon is a power threat. To the point where June 18, 2oo9 saw a historic game...the first game at the New Yankee Stadium where there was not a homerun hit. Really, that is what makes historyat a new ball park? A game with no homeruns, that's history, really?
The Red Sox ownership is in a situation where they can take what's right with Fenway and work that into a state of the art Stadium. New doesn't mean bad. Some of the newer stadiums have more space, more amenities, more to do with the family, heck some even have parking AT the stadium, not in private lots 2 miles away from the stadium where the fans spend half the time worrying if your car is even going to be there when you get back, exit routes that allow fans to stay and enjoy the game so they don't have to leave in the fourth inning to beat traffic and ensure they are home before sunrise. Some of the amenities a new ballpark would have would be very similar to what some of the changes to Fenway have been already, new concourses, new meal options, an outside experience on Yawkey Way, but the difference is it wouldn't be forced into an already cramped space.
The critics of the plan to build a new Fenway talk about the mystique of Fenway, the charm of Fenway, and the memories of Fenway. These are the same critics who said the same thing about the old Boston Garden, but I ask those folks, what is the better venue to watch a game? Obviously the Shawmut Center, uh I mean the Fleet Center, I mean the TD BankNorth Garden. It isn't the age of the stadium that gives a stadium charm and personality, it is one thing...winning and superstars. All of a sudden the new Garden has charm and personality and that is because there is a championship banner hanging from the rafters from a championship won in that building...that is charm. The Red Sox have recent Championships, Superstar players, and they win. I can't see that changing with a new home.
What is to say if a new Fenway is built, the Monster can't come along or Pesky's Pole (or Fisk's Pole, that one didn't work out to well for the brain trust), and that will be a satisfactory way of pacifying the nostalgia needs of the "Save Fenway" brigade. Once opening day rolls around in the new stadium, the pain of losing Fenway will subside the way the pain of a child losing their pet goes away as soon as Mommy brings home Fido II. Once the wins, and shutouts, and homeruns, and championships start rolling in the new Fenway will be entrenched in our hearts, but it is getting there that will be the hard part, convincing the city of Boston for the help needed to get this project going and the biggest obstacle may be just be deciding to make the call to do it.
This ownership team has the unfavorable task over the next several years to make a hard decision, keep the house of Yaz, or turn the page and begin a new chapter in the rich history of this franchise. Time marches on and real estate is is often times left in the wake of an uncaring, unattached, unstoppable force; Players retire, Horses are put out to stud, and buildings are demolished. It is the natural progression of things, and Fenway has given generations of Bostonians lifetimes of memories, but her best days are past and it is time to put her out of her misery. So to Fenway, I love you, and thanks for the memories, but now it's time to go off into and claim your place in Baseball folklore.
Sunday, March 1, 2009
Things to keep your eyes on this March
Finally March is here, and March may be one of my favorite months of the sporting year because we have Spring Training games in full swing, the NBA playoff picture begins to take final shape, the NCAA tournament gets rolling, Mel Kiper's hair will be out in all of its glory, and this year there is interest around the Bruins and hope that in April they may get out of the first round of the playoffs.
But here is what I am keeping my eyes on this spring in each of Boston's Big 4:
But here is what I am keeping my eyes on this spring in each of Boston's Big 4:
- As far as the Celtics are concerned, the focus right now is Marbury. I am really interested to see how the tatooed cranium is going to be able to fit in down the stretch as the C's fight for the best record in the East. There is a lot of concern on a national level that if the Celtics don't get the number 1 seed they are not going to be able to go into Cleveland and beat the Cavs to advance to the finals. There is certainly some credence to that line of thought, and that is where Marbury comes in. Marbury very well could be the difference maker in that series. It is interesting to note Doc Rivers said he is more concerned with the team's health moreso than securing the first seed. When I look at the two teams I think about night and day. The Celtics are a more buisness like team they let their game do their talking whereas the Cavs strike me as the more cocky arrogant team, and that could play into the Celtics favor if the C's don't get the best record. Again, I think Marbury is going to be critical to how this all plays out over the next 2o something games. Marbury was a great signing, low risk high reward. He is saying the right things so far...so far.
- Can the Bruins find their winning way again and set themselves up for the playoffs as the number one seed? Granted there have been some injuries over that past several weeks, and that reflects in their February record of 6-4-3. Despite this, the Bruins are still tied for the best record in the NHL with 93 points. I think it is going to be crucial for the Bruins to come out strong in March and play the way they have most of the season, but keep your eyes on the fast approaching trade deadline it is going to be interesting to see what moves they make...but keep in mind sometimes the best moves are the moves you don't make.
- The Red Sox are in an unfamiliar territory...a drama free Spring Training. This is a good thing, because it allows us to focus on the right things Baseball. I am keeping my eyes on the health of certain players which if healthy could March the Sox to their third World Series title since 2004. Josh Beckett was hindered in 2008 by a nagging oblique issue which hindered him throughout the season, and seemed to work itself out until a start in September against the Yankees...of course. He found a way to work through the playoffs but not up to his typical Beckett standards. So far so good this spring as Beckett showed up to camp in great shape, and seems to have good control as well velocity. This is a good sign for the Sox. The other Big Horse, or Papi if you will, is fresh off of an injury plagued campaign in 2008. David Ortiz had a nagging wrist injury all season which impacted his ability to hit the long ball. The doctors said at the end of last season Ortiz need only time and the injury should heal...that is just what Ortiz has had since October. Ortiz showed up in camp looking slender and ready to go, but is he going to be able to get back to the Ortiz we have known and loved in years past? Of course there is the rest of the rotation...keep your eyes on the health of Brad Penny and John Smoltz. With these two healthy at the back end of the rotation, this starting 5 could be as formidable a rotation there ever was in baseball. Finally how is Mike Lowell going to bounce back after hip surgery last fall? Every report so far has been encouraging, but what I am concerned about is his age, and his mental state. Early on Lowell gave an interview where he talked about how he was indeed disappointed over the potential free agent signing of Mark Teixiera which almost certainly would have been Lowell's ticket out of town. I think Lowell is of exceptional character, and a solid understanding of how the business of baseball works and should be able to bounce back...but how is his 34 year old body going to hold up after his surgery?
- How are the Patriots going to address the situation in the secondary? How are they going to address the aging linebacking core? Who is going to be the 3rd recveiver? How Healthy is Tom Brady, really? These are the questions that could put the Patriots in a spot to reclaim the top of the NFL mountain, but as much as it could put them back on top these questions could also see them have a repeat 11-5 season and miss the post-season again. As we have grown accustomed to in New England, "In Bill We Trust."
Saturday, February 28, 2009
Chief of the Cassel
The New England Patriots traded QB Matt Cassel Saturday afternoon, to the Kansas City Chiefs. This move comes 24 hours after the Patriots traded veteran LB Mike Vrabel to the Chiefs as well, in a move that is now being confirmed as a package deal. But what makes this more interesting is the man on the KC side of the table, is none other than former Patriots GM Scott Pioli. Pioli spent nine seasons as the architect of the New England dynasty before leavin in January to assume the healm in Kansas City. I am sure it won't be long before Jets fans will be talking about collusion and the two teams being in cahoots, but that is not the case. This trade was born more out of necessity than anything else for both sides.
It is going to be easy to look at this deal and say the Patriots gave up too much, only to get the 34th pick in the draft, which is the recently confirmed compensation for both Cassel and Vrabel. But this sets the Patriots up as the early winner in this chess match. The Patriots have been notorious for making the right moves at the right time, and are at the head of the class in terms of making decisions based on the needs of the business and not from a weak standpoint of sentimentality. Trading Mike Vrabel may have been an add in to the Cassel deal, but keep in mind Vrabel is on the downside of his career and was going to be a free agent next season making sense for the Pats to get some value for Vrabel now. So taking a look at the business side of this deal, it is easy to see where the Patriots line of sight was.
New England had Cassel on the books for over $14m for the 2009 season, making more than Tom Brady (whose health plays a large part in this move), hurting their cap number for this season. Mike Vrabel was set to make in the vicinity of $2m for the 2009 season. You take those two salaries off the books, it frees up $16m and gives the team more room under the cap. The Patriots are not know for giving their players overly lavish contracts. Plus the Patriots have had good second round success in recent drafts, and more than likely where they are trying to clear money off of the books wouldn't want to tie themselves to a big rookie contract. The Patriots have proven again, they want the right people for the team and they look for players who will fit into the New England Patriots system not players who have inflated stats and inflated egos. Humble pie.
Does this mean the Pats are going on a spending spree this off season? I would be surprised. I think you are going to see the Pats try and tie up some of their younger players and some of their free agents such as Vince Wilfork. In recent years the Pats have been sucessful in coming to terms with their free agents a year before they are eligible to hit free agency, and I look for this year to be much of the same with the guys who fit in the Patriots plans.
Vrable leaves and obvious gap in the line backing core, the once strength of the Pats D has been an area of concern over the past few seasons as these guys(Bruschi, Colvin, Seau, et al) get older and more injury prone. I look for Jerrod Mayo to continue to develop into one of the leagues best up and coming LB in his sophomore season, but there needs to be more depth. The Pats have some younger guys in terms of Pierre Woods and Shawn Krable who showed some promise in the pre season of 2008, before suffering a season ending leg injury. Another notable in this linebacker core is the return of Tully Banta-Cain who played the last two seasons with the San Fransico 49ers. But is that going to be enough? Probably not, and that is lucky for the Pats who seem to have a master plan in place, and it could be to trade some of their second round picks, where they now have 3, and there will be some quality linebackers who have 3-4 experience in the second round. Of course don't rule out the Pats making a play at a veteran linebacker free agent like...um...Ray Lewis.
The silver lining in this situation all but confirms Tom Terrific will be back in 2009, and I am predicting here and now the Patriots will be your Super Bowl Champions next season, as Brady will be back with a vengeance!
It is going to be easy to look at this deal and say the Patriots gave up too much, only to get the 34th pick in the draft, which is the recently confirmed compensation for both Cassel and Vrabel. But this sets the Patriots up as the early winner in this chess match. The Patriots have been notorious for making the right moves at the right time, and are at the head of the class in terms of making decisions based on the needs of the business and not from a weak standpoint of sentimentality. Trading Mike Vrabel may have been an add in to the Cassel deal, but keep in mind Vrabel is on the downside of his career and was going to be a free agent next season making sense for the Pats to get some value for Vrabel now. So taking a look at the business side of this deal, it is easy to see where the Patriots line of sight was.
New England had Cassel on the books for over $14m for the 2009 season, making more than Tom Brady (whose health plays a large part in this move), hurting their cap number for this season. Mike Vrabel was set to make in the vicinity of $2m for the 2009 season. You take those two salaries off the books, it frees up $16m and gives the team more room under the cap. The Patriots are not know for giving their players overly lavish contracts. Plus the Patriots have had good second round success in recent drafts, and more than likely where they are trying to clear money off of the books wouldn't want to tie themselves to a big rookie contract. The Patriots have proven again, they want the right people for the team and they look for players who will fit into the New England Patriots system not players who have inflated stats and inflated egos. Humble pie.
Does this mean the Pats are going on a spending spree this off season? I would be surprised. I think you are going to see the Pats try and tie up some of their younger players and some of their free agents such as Vince Wilfork. In recent years the Pats have been sucessful in coming to terms with their free agents a year before they are eligible to hit free agency, and I look for this year to be much of the same with the guys who fit in the Patriots plans.
Vrable leaves and obvious gap in the line backing core, the once strength of the Pats D has been an area of concern over the past few seasons as these guys(Bruschi, Colvin, Seau, et al) get older and more injury prone. I look for Jerrod Mayo to continue to develop into one of the leagues best up and coming LB in his sophomore season, but there needs to be more depth. The Pats have some younger guys in terms of Pierre Woods and Shawn Krable who showed some promise in the pre season of 2008, before suffering a season ending leg injury. Another notable in this linebacker core is the return of Tully Banta-Cain who played the last two seasons with the San Fransico 49ers. But is that going to be enough? Probably not, and that is lucky for the Pats who seem to have a master plan in place, and it could be to trade some of their second round picks, where they now have 3, and there will be some quality linebackers who have 3-4 experience in the second round. Of course don't rule out the Pats making a play at a veteran linebacker free agent like...um...Ray Lewis.
The silver lining in this situation all but confirms Tom Terrific will be back in 2009, and I am predicting here and now the Patriots will be your Super Bowl Champions next season, as Brady will be back with a vengeance!
Sunday, January 25, 2009
Hi-Tek talks
This Jason Varitek situation is a fascinating one, and one which should still get a bit more fascinating each day that passes by and The Red Sox captain is still unsigned. What makes it fascinating is the 3 month long game of chicken the Sox and Varitek have been playing, while the puppet master, Varitek's agent Scott Boras, seems to be tugging the wrong strings in this scenario.
Boras and Varitek (Boratek) thought they were in for a winter of being courted by potential suitors, that didn't happen, especially after Boratek declined arbitration. Now in order for Varitek to sign with any other team, that team would have to ship two draft picks to Boston (something Varitek claims he did not know, something an agent should ensure the player knows when presented with arbitration). That, apparently, has the rest of MLB thinking, "a little to rich for my blood boys." So now in lieu of several suitors, there is one...and there really was only one suitor, the Boston Red Sox.
Here is where we stand now. Varitek wants to be a member of the Red Sox and the Red Sox still want to have Varitek work their pitching staff. However, at this point I think Boratek need the Red Sox more than the Red Sox need Boratek, not to say Tek is dispensible, but the truth of the matter remains Varitek will be 37 in April, and the Sox need to get younger at that position, and Varitek's skills are steadily diminishing.
Given the lack of viable options at the catcher position, the Sox still need to (and I am confident they will) sign Jason Varitek, if it is a guaranteed second year that is holding up this deal, get it done. The second year around the ballpark of $8 million isn't going to hinder the Sox during the 2010 season, and even should Varitek go down with an injury or his bat continues to slow down (I hope it doesn't slow down to below the .220 he batted in '08) who better to tutor the two catching prospects in the Sox organization, George Kottaras or Dusty Brown, than Tek?
The fact Varitek is closer to 40 than 30 presents the very real scenario of needing to get younger behind the dish, and there is a feeling that Kottaras, Brown, or returning backstop Josh Bard are not every day catchers, so what is the next move? Easy, sign Tek for 2 years. This gives the Sox some time for a couple of things to happen, trade for a young catcher or continue to develop Kotarras or Brown. Either way, the Sox need to sign Tek, there is nothing else out there. Sure there has been talk of trading for some younger guys such as Jarrod Saltalamacchia or Taylor Teagarden from Texas or Miguel Montero from Arizona, which regardless of what happens with Tek, they Sox should still make one of those moves if the asking price makes sense, but other than that there isn't much else out there.
What we have here is a win, win, lose situation if the Sox sign Tek. Tek comes back, he gets at least a 2 year deal (in my opinion it will be 2 yrs) and the Sox get their captain back, win/win. The loss comes for Boras, who already lost some face in the wake of these negotiations when Varitek and Sox owner John Henry had a 90 minute face to face meeting to try to get the ball rolling again without Boras present. Not that I have ever met any of the parties involved in these negotiations, but you have to think Varitek feels a bit baited and switched, it is telling to me that Tek didn't know if he declined arbitration the Sox would get two draft picks, even Tek has to know he's not worth that much. Boras and the Red Sox had a solid working relationship which began to sour with the antics of former Left Fielder, Manny Ramirez. Manny wanted out of his contract with Boston so he could hit the Free Agent market this offseason and secure at least a 4 year deal as opposed to the two options at $20 million the Sox held, Manny threw the quintessential "take my ball and go home" fit. This forced the Sox to trade Manny to LA at the 2008 trading deadline (where they got Jason Bay who filled in nicely in Left). My feeling is the Boras over calculated what teams would be willing to sign Ramirez for and overplayed his hand in that situation as well as the Tek scenario. Point of interest, Manny is still on the market in late January, who would have thunk it?. The relationship continued to hit a sour note with the Mark Teixira negotiations when the Sox were the front runners to land the slugging first baseman, until he signed with the Sox primary rivals, the New York Yankees. Boras cut off his nose to spite his face, had Boras worked with the Sox to get Tex, he could have gotten Tek signed at a higher price in an unofficial package, and then the Yanks would have been desperate and signed Manny to a better deal than what he is going to get now.
This has to be a tough situation for Varitek who is one of the most loyal people in the game, loyal to the team where he caught 4 no hitters, and won two World Series, and loyal to the agent who 4 years ago got him a 4 year $40 million contract at the age of 33. Tek wants to retire in Boston, and I am confident he is going to retire in Boston, but all parties involved need to take a step back and take off their rose colored glasses and be able to call a spade and get this deal done.
Boras and Varitek (Boratek) thought they were in for a winter of being courted by potential suitors, that didn't happen, especially after Boratek declined arbitration. Now in order for Varitek to sign with any other team, that team would have to ship two draft picks to Boston (something Varitek claims he did not know, something an agent should ensure the player knows when presented with arbitration). That, apparently, has the rest of MLB thinking, "a little to rich for my blood boys." So now in lieu of several suitors, there is one...and there really was only one suitor, the Boston Red Sox.
Here is where we stand now. Varitek wants to be a member of the Red Sox and the Red Sox still want to have Varitek work their pitching staff. However, at this point I think Boratek need the Red Sox more than the Red Sox need Boratek, not to say Tek is dispensible, but the truth of the matter remains Varitek will be 37 in April, and the Sox need to get younger at that position, and Varitek's skills are steadily diminishing.
Given the lack of viable options at the catcher position, the Sox still need to (and I am confident they will) sign Jason Varitek, if it is a guaranteed second year that is holding up this deal, get it done. The second year around the ballpark of $8 million isn't going to hinder the Sox during the 2010 season, and even should Varitek go down with an injury or his bat continues to slow down (I hope it doesn't slow down to below the .220 he batted in '08) who better to tutor the two catching prospects in the Sox organization, George Kottaras or Dusty Brown, than Tek?
The fact Varitek is closer to 40 than 30 presents the very real scenario of needing to get younger behind the dish, and there is a feeling that Kottaras, Brown, or returning backstop Josh Bard are not every day catchers, so what is the next move? Easy, sign Tek for 2 years. This gives the Sox some time for a couple of things to happen, trade for a young catcher or continue to develop Kotarras or Brown. Either way, the Sox need to sign Tek, there is nothing else out there. Sure there has been talk of trading for some younger guys such as Jarrod Saltalamacchia or Taylor Teagarden from Texas or Miguel Montero from Arizona, which regardless of what happens with Tek, they Sox should still make one of those moves if the asking price makes sense, but other than that there isn't much else out there.
What we have here is a win, win, lose situation if the Sox sign Tek. Tek comes back, he gets at least a 2 year deal (in my opinion it will be 2 yrs) and the Sox get their captain back, win/win. The loss comes for Boras, who already lost some face in the wake of these negotiations when Varitek and Sox owner John Henry had a 90 minute face to face meeting to try to get the ball rolling again without Boras present. Not that I have ever met any of the parties involved in these negotiations, but you have to think Varitek feels a bit baited and switched, it is telling to me that Tek didn't know if he declined arbitration the Sox would get two draft picks, even Tek has to know he's not worth that much. Boras and the Red Sox had a solid working relationship which began to sour with the antics of former Left Fielder, Manny Ramirez. Manny wanted out of his contract with Boston so he could hit the Free Agent market this offseason and secure at least a 4 year deal as opposed to the two options at $20 million the Sox held, Manny threw the quintessential "take my ball and go home" fit. This forced the Sox to trade Manny to LA at the 2008 trading deadline (where they got Jason Bay who filled in nicely in Left). My feeling is the Boras over calculated what teams would be willing to sign Ramirez for and overplayed his hand in that situation as well as the Tek scenario. Point of interest, Manny is still on the market in late January, who would have thunk it?. The relationship continued to hit a sour note with the Mark Teixira negotiations when the Sox were the front runners to land the slugging first baseman, until he signed with the Sox primary rivals, the New York Yankees. Boras cut off his nose to spite his face, had Boras worked with the Sox to get Tex, he could have gotten Tek signed at a higher price in an unofficial package, and then the Yanks would have been desperate and signed Manny to a better deal than what he is going to get now.
This has to be a tough situation for Varitek who is one of the most loyal people in the game, loyal to the team where he caught 4 no hitters, and won two World Series, and loyal to the agent who 4 years ago got him a 4 year $40 million contract at the age of 33. Tek wants to retire in Boston, and I am confident he is going to retire in Boston, but all parties involved need to take a step back and take off their rose colored glasses and be able to call a spade and get this deal done.
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
DeFillippo Jagged Off
You interview, you're fired. That was the basic premise coming out of the Athletic Department of Boston College over the past few days as the story was leaked indicating BC Head Football Coach, Jeff Jagodzinski, was going to be fired if he interviewed for the vacant New York Jets Head Coach position in the NFL. Apparently Coach Jags interviewed yesterday, and was subsequently fired today. Hats off to BC Athletic Director Gene DeFillippo.
DeFillippo has something rare in organized sports today...integrity. Integrity for himself, the people he hires, but more importantly for his Athletic Program. DeFillippo held a press conference today to talk about the events of the day, more at a high level not drilling down to the details, but did it in a way that left both parties with their dignity. DeFillippo referenced his personal relationship with Coach Jags, saying he was a good friend before Jags came to BC and expects that friendship to continue. He would not discuss specifics or a time line of the events which transpired, but handled himself in a manner which suggested he was taken by surpise, hurt, but ready to move on as well. DeFillippo, at one point in the press conference, actually read a statement Coach Jags had prepared, again showing the class and integrity of BC's AD. This is the first time I have ever witnessed anything like this, where a situation which could have turned ugly, I mean Willie McGhee ugly, seems to have worked out amicably for both parties. I have used my reading between the lines ability to conclude there must be an agreement in place where neither party is going to publicly discuss, timelines, details, or financial restitution (which you have to assume there is).
I have no issue with coaches looking for better opportunities,and realistically Coach Jags may not have like the whole NCAA thing (recruiting, dealing with Alumni, and oh yeah running a Major Conference Football Program) and that is fine, but I feel Coach Jags didn't do the right thing here. If this was year four of a five year contract, and he pulled DeFillippo aside and said "Hey Geno, I don't know this college thing is working out, and I want to return to the NFL, I think there may be a few things I may look into, is that cool?" It may or may not be cool, but it would have been the right thing to do. To Manny out of a contract to get back to the NFL after only two years, leaves the program between scared and screwed. This give the perception to potential recruits of an unstable program, this leaves the AD to find a new head coach in the fat of recruiting season, and what about the players who came because of Coach Jags? Do they think themselves lied to and taken advantage of? What about the coaching staff, granted a majority of the coaches are left over from the last regime, but now they have to be thinking about their future. How is the program to begin to move on from the 2 game losing streak they are on, and now add this drama to it, I do not envy Mr. DeFillippo right now, but I do respect him.
Coaching changes in College Football where a coach leaves for a better opportunity is not rare occurence in this day and age, but what makes this one different is the way DeFillippo handled the aftermath. A case could be made the fact it was so public wasn't handled correctly by either party, but the way it was dealt with in the end, ultimately was the right thing for both DeFillippo and Coach Jags, but I fear this is just the tip of the iceberg of what is to come.
DeFillippo has something rare in organized sports today...integrity. Integrity for himself, the people he hires, but more importantly for his Athletic Program. DeFillippo held a press conference today to talk about the events of the day, more at a high level not drilling down to the details, but did it in a way that left both parties with their dignity. DeFillippo referenced his personal relationship with Coach Jags, saying he was a good friend before Jags came to BC and expects that friendship to continue. He would not discuss specifics or a time line of the events which transpired, but handled himself in a manner which suggested he was taken by surpise, hurt, but ready to move on as well. DeFillippo, at one point in the press conference, actually read a statement Coach Jags had prepared, again showing the class and integrity of BC's AD. This is the first time I have ever witnessed anything like this, where a situation which could have turned ugly, I mean Willie McGhee ugly, seems to have worked out amicably for both parties. I have used my reading between the lines ability to conclude there must be an agreement in place where neither party is going to publicly discuss, timelines, details, or financial restitution (which you have to assume there is).
I have no issue with coaches looking for better opportunities,and realistically Coach Jags may not have like the whole NCAA thing (recruiting, dealing with Alumni, and oh yeah running a Major Conference Football Program) and that is fine, but I feel Coach Jags didn't do the right thing here. If this was year four of a five year contract, and he pulled DeFillippo aside and said "Hey Geno, I don't know this college thing is working out, and I want to return to the NFL, I think there may be a few things I may look into, is that cool?" It may or may not be cool, but it would have been the right thing to do. To Manny out of a contract to get back to the NFL after only two years, leaves the program between scared and screwed. This give the perception to potential recruits of an unstable program, this leaves the AD to find a new head coach in the fat of recruiting season, and what about the players who came because of Coach Jags? Do they think themselves lied to and taken advantage of? What about the coaching staff, granted a majority of the coaches are left over from the last regime, but now they have to be thinking about their future. How is the program to begin to move on from the 2 game losing streak they are on, and now add this drama to it, I do not envy Mr. DeFillippo right now, but I do respect him.
Coaching changes in College Football where a coach leaves for a better opportunity is not rare occurence in this day and age, but what makes this one different is the way DeFillippo handled the aftermath. A case could be made the fact it was so public wasn't handled correctly by either party, but the way it was dealt with in the end, ultimately was the right thing for both DeFillippo and Coach Jags, but I fear this is just the tip of the iceberg of what is to come.
Sunday, January 4, 2009
Wild Card Weekend
I still have a hard time swallowing the "Patriots ended the 2008 season with an 11-5 record and didn't make the playoffs, but also lost the division to the friggin' Dolphins" pill. But something happened around 10:30 am on January 4, 2008 as I was watching the Saturday Wild Card games on DVR...I can watch the games and route against the teams I hate! Pissah!
I was with the majority of Patriots fans who hated Peyton Manning, until their Super Bowl season, when my Mom asked me why I hated Manning. I had to sit back and just as I was about to say "he's over-rated, and he is in too many commercials," my Mom hit me off with on of the best follow up questions I have ever seen in my experience in the media, "How would you feel about Manning if you weren't a Patriots fan?" I thought about it, and actually Peyton Manning is everything I believe a pro athlete should be. So I have been able to appreciate Manning ever since then, that being said this morning I got to watch the Colts take on the San Diego Chargers. Now the Chargers are the franchise I hate more than any other in Pro Sports, yes that includes the Yankees. I always have despised the attitude of the Chargers, and especially after the recent contests between the Pats and Chargers. I hate their higher than tho attitude, and Philip Rivers is the quintessential spoiled brat. When those two masses meet, it was easy and fun for me to route for the Colts...until Reggie Wayne and Peyton Manning forgot how to connect on the long ball. The fact the Colts lost to the Chargers is a similar feeling, to a lesser degree, as if the Pats had lost to the Chargers in a playoff game.
Of course before that game, I was watching the NFC Wild Card game between the Falcons and the Cardinals. This was a great game for me because I was able to sit back without any real care as to the outcome of the game, and watch two all-time great skill players in Kurt Warner and Edgerrin James do what they did back in their heyday. On the other side of the ball it was great to see Boston College's own Matty "Heisman (even though he didn't win the Heisman)" Ryan continue his story like rookie season into the Playoffs. Ultimately the Falcons had to play from a position they hadn't had to play from all season, behind. Atlanta did alright, but ultimately lost to the home town Cardinals, but it was certainly an entertaining game, and was a better game than what most of us Man-Town experts thought it would be.
Then just a few minutes ago, I had another unique experience...I was a Ravens fan. Yeah, a Ravens fan. I hate Baltimore fans, as they are more arrogant and less knowledgeable than Boston fans, and here I am cheering like a fool alongside of them, and yes it is because of a hatred I have cultivated toward Miami since 1986 and the "Squish the Fish" game. I have long felt Chad Pennington ins the epotime of an over rated quarterback. He just annoys me, usually I can give you some facts and legitimate in-sight, but truth be told he just friggin' annoys me, so to see him throw 3 interceptions was fabulous, superb, nifty, wicked awesome, fantabulous! I loved it. I don't get Yankees Fans in Boston, and on that same note, I don't get Dolphin fans in Patriot territory either. To be quite ignorantly honest with you that is a major part of my disdain for the Dolphins as well, and the best thing about sports, is sometimes that is all you need to wish for misery to a franchise.
There is still the Philly/Minnesotta game, but you know what...I couldn't care less about that game. I really couldn't. So instead of watching that, I am watching some MLB network shows I have on my DVR. I will probably watch the second half of that game, but maybe I will go to the gym, or make my Chicken Salad for my lunches for the week, who knows. I have already had my fun this weekend. Another plus for this weekend, with all of the games, it gives us the opportunity to move on from all the nonsensical Brett Favre drama.
Of course, the only thing which would have made this weekend better for me is having the Pats in the playoffs beating the Ravens in Foxboro, but as Mick Jagger said "You don't always get what you want, but if you try sometime you find, you get what you need."
I was with the majority of Patriots fans who hated Peyton Manning, until their Super Bowl season, when my Mom asked me why I hated Manning. I had to sit back and just as I was about to say "he's over-rated, and he is in too many commercials," my Mom hit me off with on of the best follow up questions I have ever seen in my experience in the media, "How would you feel about Manning if you weren't a Patriots fan?" I thought about it, and actually Peyton Manning is everything I believe a pro athlete should be. So I have been able to appreciate Manning ever since then, that being said this morning I got to watch the Colts take on the San Diego Chargers. Now the Chargers are the franchise I hate more than any other in Pro Sports, yes that includes the Yankees. I always have despised the attitude of the Chargers, and especially after the recent contests between the Pats and Chargers. I hate their higher than tho attitude, and Philip Rivers is the quintessential spoiled brat. When those two masses meet, it was easy and fun for me to route for the Colts...until Reggie Wayne and Peyton Manning forgot how to connect on the long ball. The fact the Colts lost to the Chargers is a similar feeling, to a lesser degree, as if the Pats had lost to the Chargers in a playoff game.
Of course before that game, I was watching the NFC Wild Card game between the Falcons and the Cardinals. This was a great game for me because I was able to sit back without any real care as to the outcome of the game, and watch two all-time great skill players in Kurt Warner and Edgerrin James do what they did back in their heyday. On the other side of the ball it was great to see Boston College's own Matty "Heisman (even though he didn't win the Heisman)" Ryan continue his story like rookie season into the Playoffs. Ultimately the Falcons had to play from a position they hadn't had to play from all season, behind. Atlanta did alright, but ultimately lost to the home town Cardinals, but it was certainly an entertaining game, and was a better game than what most of us Man-Town experts thought it would be.
Then just a few minutes ago, I had another unique experience...I was a Ravens fan. Yeah, a Ravens fan. I hate Baltimore fans, as they are more arrogant and less knowledgeable than Boston fans, and here I am cheering like a fool alongside of them, and yes it is because of a hatred I have cultivated toward Miami since 1986 and the "Squish the Fish" game. I have long felt Chad Pennington ins the epotime of an over rated quarterback. He just annoys me, usually I can give you some facts and legitimate in-sight, but truth be told he just friggin' annoys me, so to see him throw 3 interceptions was fabulous, superb, nifty, wicked awesome, fantabulous! I loved it. I don't get Yankees Fans in Boston, and on that same note, I don't get Dolphin fans in Patriot territory either. To be quite ignorantly honest with you that is a major part of my disdain for the Dolphins as well, and the best thing about sports, is sometimes that is all you need to wish for misery to a franchise.
There is still the Philly/Minnesotta game, but you know what...I couldn't care less about that game. I really couldn't. So instead of watching that, I am watching some MLB network shows I have on my DVR. I will probably watch the second half of that game, but maybe I will go to the gym, or make my Chicken Salad for my lunches for the week, who knows. I have already had my fun this weekend. Another plus for this weekend, with all of the games, it gives us the opportunity to move on from all the nonsensical Brett Favre drama.
Of course, the only thing which would have made this weekend better for me is having the Pats in the playoffs beating the Ravens in Foxboro, but as Mick Jagger said "You don't always get what you want, but if you try sometime you find, you get what you need."
Sunday, November 30, 2008
Athletes and Guns
The self inflicted gunshot wound of New York Giants Wide Reciever, Plaxico Burress, has brought the issue of guns and professional athletes to the forefront of the media. This is certainly an interesting dynamic in the world of pro sports in 2008, and raises the question "Why do athletes need to carry a gun?" As far as I am concerned, I feel pro athletes in many cases do indeed need to carry a firearm for their protection. The key word is protection. Not as an accessory...protection. Pro athletes are targets, that is a fact, and why shouldn't they protect themselves? For those who don't feel comfortable handling a firearm, they hire bodyguards who will handle the firearm for them. Many pro athletes have guns, and they have them registered. Whoa, there is a noble concept, register your gun. The reason they have gun, is they understand they are a target. There have been several incidents of Pro Athletes being victims of violent crimes over the years, some fatal, some non-fatal, and some walk away and continue their careers.
Boston Celtics Forward, Paul Pierce, was stabbed as many as 11 times around the neck in 2000 during a night club altercation. Pierce miraculously somehow someway, did not suffer life threatening injuries and was able to recover both his health and his career. Pierce's former teammate in Boston, Antoine Walker, twice has been a victim of a robbery at gunpoint. Both happened in Chicago, Walker's hometown. The first happened in July 2000 when Walker and fellow NBA baller Nazr Mohammed were held up at gunpoint while waiting for a restaurant to open. The second may have been a bit more scary for Walker who was held up and bound at gunpoint at his home in Chicago. I think the common thread is the most obvious one, they are pro athletes with absurd payrolls compared to the common man.
Pierce and Walker were lucky to get out of those situations with their life, and careers, not all athletes can say that. Last season, Washington Redskins Safety Sean Taylor was fatally shot in his Miami home where Taylor was the victim of a burglary. The trial in the death of Taylor has been suspended until early next year.
September 2, 2008, Jacksonville Jaguars Offensive Tackle Richard Collier was shot and critically wounded while sitting in a Cadillac Escalade. Luckily Collier survived, but his career didn't. Collier is now paralyzed from the waist down, and had his left leg amputated. Granted this is a retaliation for an altercation which had taken place earlier in a club.
These are situations where firearms are warranted, and who knows how different the outcomes may have been. There have been too many situations where other athletes carry pieces to remain true to their roots, maintain their street cred. Who cares about street cred. These guys are getting paid millions of dollars to play, what are in most American's eyes, a kids game, when these same Americans are concerned about losing their jobs, and these guys are out dropping G-notes at clubs, blinding people with their obnoxious bling, up at the DJ booths spinning the wax, but in case that isn't enough we see a handufl of them waiving their Smith and Wesson from side to side (some actually keep it in their belt just some people can see it)?
I have a simple solution and words of wisdom for the Plaxico Burress' of the world...DON'T PUT YOURSELF IN THESE FRIGGIN SITUATIONS!! Look, as an athlete you are going to always be a mark. Have we learned nothing from Pacman Jones, Sebastian Telfair, and now Plaxico Burress? If you feel you are a mark(which again as a pro athlete you always will be), and you feel you are going to be in danger, the US Constitution allows you the right to bear arms...it doesn't allow you the right to arm yourself and act like an ass. As fans we need to understand these guys are people first, Fathers, Sons, Brothers, Uncles, and Friends, and they should protect themselves, but enough is enough. The rest of these guys who carry a gun for the solidiciation of their testicular fortitude, ENOUGH!
Boston Celtics Forward, Paul Pierce, was stabbed as many as 11 times around the neck in 2000 during a night club altercation. Pierce miraculously somehow someway, did not suffer life threatening injuries and was able to recover both his health and his career. Pierce's former teammate in Boston, Antoine Walker, twice has been a victim of a robbery at gunpoint. Both happened in Chicago, Walker's hometown. The first happened in July 2000 when Walker and fellow NBA baller Nazr Mohammed were held up at gunpoint while waiting for a restaurant to open. The second may have been a bit more scary for Walker who was held up and bound at gunpoint at his home in Chicago. I think the common thread is the most obvious one, they are pro athletes with absurd payrolls compared to the common man.
Pierce and Walker were lucky to get out of those situations with their life, and careers, not all athletes can say that. Last season, Washington Redskins Safety Sean Taylor was fatally shot in his Miami home where Taylor was the victim of a burglary. The trial in the death of Taylor has been suspended until early next year.
September 2, 2008, Jacksonville Jaguars Offensive Tackle Richard Collier was shot and critically wounded while sitting in a Cadillac Escalade. Luckily Collier survived, but his career didn't. Collier is now paralyzed from the waist down, and had his left leg amputated. Granted this is a retaliation for an altercation which had taken place earlier in a club.
These are situations where firearms are warranted, and who knows how different the outcomes may have been. There have been too many situations where other athletes carry pieces to remain true to their roots, maintain their street cred. Who cares about street cred. These guys are getting paid millions of dollars to play, what are in most American's eyes, a kids game, when these same Americans are concerned about losing their jobs, and these guys are out dropping G-notes at clubs, blinding people with their obnoxious bling, up at the DJ booths spinning the wax, but in case that isn't enough we see a handufl of them waiving their Smith and Wesson from side to side (some actually keep it in their belt just some people can see it)?
I have a simple solution and words of wisdom for the Plaxico Burress' of the world...DON'T PUT YOURSELF IN THESE FRIGGIN SITUATIONS!! Look, as an athlete you are going to always be a mark. Have we learned nothing from Pacman Jones, Sebastian Telfair, and now Plaxico Burress? If you feel you are a mark(which again as a pro athlete you always will be), and you feel you are going to be in danger, the US Constitution allows you the right to bear arms...it doesn't allow you the right to arm yourself and act like an ass. As fans we need to understand these guys are people first, Fathers, Sons, Brothers, Uncles, and Friends, and they should protect themselves, but enough is enough. The rest of these guys who carry a gun for the solidiciation of their testicular fortitude, ENOUGH!
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Franchise Cassel?
Matt Cassel's performances over the past 2 games have been historic, well to the Patriots at the very least. Two consecutive games of over 400 yards passing, and people are already talking about a QB controversy in New England. Gone and forgotten is Tom Brady. Yes folks, the same Tom Brady who led this team to 3 Super Bowl Championships in 4 tries, a perfect regular season, and who led the Patriots from obscurity. Remember him kids? Remember Giselle and the little dog? Remember the Saturday Night Live performance? Or more importantly the Tuck Rule Game? The battles with the Colts? His MVP season last season? How the heck have we forgotten Tom Brady already?
Now with Cassel's success of late and the uncertainty of Brady's rehab from knee surgery, the Patriots fellowship is already named Matt Cassel the successor to Brady, please allow me to point out the flaws in this line of thought.
Now with Cassel's success of late and the uncertainty of Brady's rehab from knee surgery, the Patriots fellowship is already named Matt Cassel the successor to Brady, please allow me to point out the flaws in this line of thought.
- Financially: The only way the Pats are keeping Cassel is to franchise him, and in order to do that they are going to have pay him a salary equal to the average of the top 5 QB's in the NFL. The Pats typically do not shell out that kind of moolah for superstars, let alone at a position to potentially back up one of the best QB's of all-time...again
- Logically: Have we seen or heard anything to believe Brady is done for next season? And please don't start in on the Bledsoe/Brady argument. Two different scenarios. Granted Bledsoe put this franchise back on the map, but isn't close to the QB Brady IS. See what I did there? I said IS and specifically didn't say was. Brady is going to be back, and just as good as he was when he left. Will he have a season like he did in 2007? Not likely. But I like him throwing to the likes of Welker, Moss, and...well anyone in a Patriots uniform.
- Idiots: The people who are talking about franchising Cassel are the same idiots who were trying to run him out of town from the first pre-season game until the second half of the first quarter of the first game of the season. Typical fair weather, uneducated New England sports fans, who have taken over the majority from us...the people who lived and died with the Red Sox, Pats, and Celtics during the championship drought from 1986 until 2002 when the Pats won their first Super Bowl. Granted, the way Cassel played in that span, those sentiments were warranted, but don't sit there and tell me Cassel is the QB you want running your franchise.
- Really: Do you really think Cassel wants to be here next year? He knows what is going on. As much as every completion gets the Patriots one step closer to the Playoffs, it is also adding another zero to his next contract, which is going to be bigger than he ever imagined. There is already talk and rumblings of a McDaniel/Cassel package where both youngsters are in for a considerable pay raise.
Saturday, November 22, 2008
Lucic, just what the NHL needs....
When was the last time Boston was excited about regular season Bruins game? When was the last time Bruins fans have been energized by one player? When was the last time there was Bruins talk on WEEI? When was the last time people cared about the Bruins? Well none of this matters right now, because tonight the Bruins take on the Montreal Canadiens, the NHL's answer to the Red Sox and Yankees, the Celtics and Lakers, and the Patriots and Colts. The names have changed, the style of play has changed...back, the rivalry hasn't changed, the Habs are still the hated. But tonight another chapter will be added...Lucic vs the Canadiens.
Milan Lucic has brought back the type of intensity the Bruins have lacked since Cam Neely retired in 1996, and now he has a dance partner north of the border in George Laraque. Laraque was brought in to be the answer to the Habs Mike Komisarek, who has been wanting a piece of Lucic going back to last season. Things hit the boiling point during the meeing in Boston on November 13th when Lucic destroyed Komisarek in a Cam Neeley/Chris Nyland style brawl. Laraque tried to goade Lucic into a fight earlier in that game, but Lucic was smart and didn't want to disrupt the momentum the Bruins had built, so then Laraque moved down the line to Shawn Thornton, who had the same mindset. There has been some talk from Laraque over the past day or two, but Lucic acts like he has been here before. Throughout the first period the Habs have been going after Lucic, but Lucic has kept his composure despite the chants of "Lucic, Lucic, Lucic" blanketing the Belle Centre in Montreal. Lucic has kept quiet, played his game, and has been somewhat of a non-factor through the first period, but like in Rocky II when Rocky learned to fight righty, everyone was waiting for him to unleash the left, I have a feeling Claude Julien will be playing the part of Mickey tonight.
To use another Rocky analagy, to the casual observer it would appear Lucic is getting crushed everytime he comes withing sight of the puck, but I think back to Rocky III when Appollo looks at Paulie and says Rocky is getting killed out there, and Paulie looks at Appollo and says, no "he's getting mad." I can't wait for Lucic to get mad, Bruins Den can't wait for Lucic to get mad, and the NHL can't wait for Lucic to get mad. It may say 2008 on the calendar, but it feels like 1978. GO LUCIC!
Milan Lucic has brought back the type of intensity the Bruins have lacked since Cam Neely retired in 1996, and now he has a dance partner north of the border in George Laraque. Laraque was brought in to be the answer to the Habs Mike Komisarek, who has been wanting a piece of Lucic going back to last season. Things hit the boiling point during the meeing in Boston on November 13th when Lucic destroyed Komisarek in a Cam Neeley/Chris Nyland style brawl. Laraque tried to goade Lucic into a fight earlier in that game, but Lucic was smart and didn't want to disrupt the momentum the Bruins had built, so then Laraque moved down the line to Shawn Thornton, who had the same mindset. There has been some talk from Laraque over the past day or two, but Lucic acts like he has been here before. Throughout the first period the Habs have been going after Lucic, but Lucic has kept his composure despite the chants of "Lucic, Lucic, Lucic" blanketing the Belle Centre in Montreal. Lucic has kept quiet, played his game, and has been somewhat of a non-factor through the first period, but like in Rocky II when Rocky learned to fight righty, everyone was waiting for him to unleash the left, I have a feeling Claude Julien will be playing the part of Mickey tonight.
To use another Rocky analagy, to the casual observer it would appear Lucic is getting crushed everytime he comes withing sight of the puck, but I think back to Rocky III when Appollo looks at Paulie and says Rocky is getting killed out there, and Paulie looks at Appollo and says, no "he's getting mad." I can't wait for Lucic to get mad, Bruins Den can't wait for Lucic to get mad, and the NHL can't wait for Lucic to get mad. It may say 2008 on the calendar, but it feels like 1978. GO LUCIC!
Friday, November 21, 2008
Lowell Connector to Tex
A couple of weeks back, David Ortiz inadvertently told a reporter, the Red Sox need another 30 Homerun guy, there was speculation he was talking about Teixiera, and all of a sudden the Sox are the front runners in the Mark Teixeira sweepstakes, something I definately think is the right move for this team to stay competitive. Aside from keeping if not setting the pace in the AL this move would allow the Sox to get younger, Tex is still not even 28 and about to enter his prime, and their is no better place for him to do that than in Fenway.
Certainly there is something to be said about the juggling that would have to be done in order to get Tex down to Fenway Park, which most likely is going to involve the Trade of Red Sox Nation favorite and 2007 World Series MVP, Mike Lowell. Some fans tend to think that Lowell is untradable. Why? His Contract? Nope. His age? Come on no agism here kids. The reason, his clubhouse presence. Clubhouse presence. Really? That's it. Not that fact he is overpaid, injury prone, 34 years old, and no body knows how he is going to respond to off season surgery. There is certainly some prudence to those sentiments, but haven't we been down this road before? The Red Sox have taken the Godfather approach business not personal when trading Nomar Garciaparra, letting Pedro Martinez and Johnny Damon walk and things seemed to have worked out alright.
Now that we have that out of the way, we can look at how the 2009 Red Sox line-up may look.
CF-Jacoby Ellsbury
2B-Dustin Pedroia
DH-David Ortiz
1B- Mark Teixiera
3B- Kevin Youkillis
LF- Jason Bay
RF- JD Drew
C- Jason Varitek (yup, he will be back, just a predicition)
SS- Jed Lowrie
Stay tuned for a third World Series title since 2004...
Certainly there is something to be said about the juggling that would have to be done in order to get Tex down to Fenway Park, which most likely is going to involve the Trade of Red Sox Nation favorite and 2007 World Series MVP, Mike Lowell. Some fans tend to think that Lowell is untradable. Why? His Contract? Nope. His age? Come on no agism here kids. The reason, his clubhouse presence. Clubhouse presence. Really? That's it. Not that fact he is overpaid, injury prone, 34 years old, and no body knows how he is going to respond to off season surgery. There is certainly some prudence to those sentiments, but haven't we been down this road before? The Red Sox have taken the Godfather approach business not personal when trading Nomar Garciaparra, letting Pedro Martinez and Johnny Damon walk and things seemed to have worked out alright.
Now that we have that out of the way, we can look at how the 2009 Red Sox line-up may look.
CF-Jacoby Ellsbury
2B-Dustin Pedroia
DH-David Ortiz
1B- Mark Teixiera
3B- Kevin Youkillis
LF- Jason Bay
RF- JD Drew
C- Jason Varitek (yup, he will be back, just a predicition)
SS- Jed Lowrie
Stay tuned for a third World Series title since 2004...
The Next generation of the Evil Empire
Last summer I found myself deeply enjoying the ESPN original mini-series "The Bronx is Burning." It focused on the 1977 New York Yankees and really focused on the relationship between owner George Steinbrenner, Manager Billy Martin, team captain and catcher Thurman Munson, and the first major free agent superstar Reggie Jackson. It gave in interesting take into the mind of George Steinbrenner, and I had to work hard to eliminate my disdain for the man, as I am a born and bred Red Sox fan, but once I was able to really look at what it was that made the man tick...the more I was able to appreciate the sheer genius of the man. Genius usually comes at a price, and Steinbrenner's, in my opinion, was his passion. He was never very good at seperating personal feelings from business, but that is what made the Red Sox/Yankees dynamic so interesting, explosive, and infurriating at the same time. Over the last 3 years Steinbrenner's health has been in steady decline, and as a by product so has the rivalry. The Yankees haven't been a factor to Red Sox Nation since Boston completed the great comeback in 2004. A rivalry dead?
Not so much my friends, just on hyatis. With Papa Bear Steinbrenner not healty enough to run the Evil Empire, and the Yankees in a situation where they are in a salary dump scenario, enter Baby Bear, Hank Steinbrenner. Hank is poised to be a re-incarnation of his Father from 31 years ago, and you are already seeing that in this off-season. He has already made an obnoxious offer to C.C. Sabathia as well as they are looking into offering ridiculous money to both Derek Lowe and AJ Burnett. What about Manny Ramirez? Hanky Boy has already said the Yankees are ready to explore all options. Of course you have to assume that means they are going to at somepoint if nothing else explore the Manny Ramirez possibility.
If this early course continues to take the hapes it is forging, we are going to be in for another decade of great baseball in the American League East.
Not so much my friends, just on hyatis. With Papa Bear Steinbrenner not healty enough to run the Evil Empire, and the Yankees in a situation where they are in a salary dump scenario, enter Baby Bear, Hank Steinbrenner. Hank is poised to be a re-incarnation of his Father from 31 years ago, and you are already seeing that in this off-season. He has already made an obnoxious offer to C.C. Sabathia as well as they are looking into offering ridiculous money to both Derek Lowe and AJ Burnett. What about Manny Ramirez? Hanky Boy has already said the Yankees are ready to explore all options. Of course you have to assume that means they are going to at somepoint if nothing else explore the Manny Ramirez possibility.
If this early course continues to take the hapes it is forging, we are going to be in for another decade of great baseball in the American League East.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
